Find a Lawyer

MISS FARAH NAZ versus GENERAL MANAGER (ADMN.) MILLAT TRACTOR LIMITED, LAHORE

Section 25 Employee Complaint Request Resignation Employee alleges that his resignation was the result of unlawful repression and repression; the company's manager administered the inspection by employing them to establish employees. Nothing was said of the strong record of coercion, power, or resignation from the job, evidence did not indicate that the employee was forced to resign by the employee, but he had voluntarily resigned. He did not even bother to give notice of the complaint during the stipulated period. Eleven months after the resignation of his resignation, the petition was also filed after more than eleven months, which gave no proper reason to the Labor Court. Under the circumstances, the employees' complaint was requested. Was rightfully excluded.

Related judgments — Punjab, 2012

• TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, CHINIOT v. QASIM ALI 2012 PLC 121
• GHULAM SARWAR v. GENERAL MANAGER, ITTEHAD CHEMICAL (PVT.) LIMITED 2012 PLC 124
• EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (WORKS AND SERVICES) DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, JHANG v. MUHAMMAD NAWAZ 2012 PLC 147
• ADAM SUGAR MILLS LTD., CHISHTIAN DISTRICT BAHAWALNAGAR v. MUHAMMAD IQBAL 2012 PLC 152
• ALLIED BANK LIMITED v. KHALID HUSSAIN 2012 PLC 166
• TARIQ MUNAWAR v. MANAGING DIRECTOR, SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LTD., LAHORE 2012 PLC 173
• QUDRAT ULLAH v. FACTORY MANAGER, MITCHELL\'S FRUIT FARMS LIMITED RENALA KHURD, DISTRICT OKARA 2012 PLC 183
• MUHAMMAD AZAM v. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (E), GUJRANWALA ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY LIMITED MANDI BAHAUDDIN 2012 PLC 189

All Punjab judgments of 2012 →

best advocate from Sherani lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes