CHIEF EXECUTIVE, MEPCO, MULTAN versus ALLAH BACHAYA SAJJAD
Section O15 Punjab Industrial Relations Act (XIX of 2010), SS 33 and 47 Service Removal Complaint Petition Job, who was removed from the job for one month and eleven days absence from the job, has been removed for 8 years. Complaints filed after a long time. The Labor Court, which allowed employees to make non-judicial decisions when they rejected the Department's appeal, instead of filing an appeal against the Labor Court's decision, sent a reminder after the reminder and asked the Prime Minister The case was busy dealing with the request for intervention, but his efforts did not result and the time was a waste of time. The employee did not appear in court, taking such a neat case, which the Department of Appeal rejected. After more than 120 days should have arrived at the appropriate forum, the matter has been withheld for 8 years, Ada The disputes between addicts cannot be settled in the merits of the complaint filed by the employee over time, the labor court was not justified in asserting the jurisdiction of the child, which was unreasonable, if relieved. If such an apology was delayed, it would be against the spirit of the Legislature on this subject and put an end to it. The controversial decision of the ineffective Labor Court not to be sustained, set aside, in the circumstances \ r \ n
