QUDRAT ULLAH versus FACTORY MANAGER, MITCHELL\'S FRUIT FARMS LIMITED RENALA KHURD, DISTRICT OKARA
Section O15 Punjab Industrial Relations Act (XIX of 2010), Sections 33 and 47 Application for Complaint Complaint to the Employee Employee Employed in the Company as a Laboratory Assistant Inquiring Employee for "Misconduct" Against Employment He was later dismissed from the job. Being a laboratory assistant, the condensed milk supplied by dairy farms was tested and made a false result and it caused great harm to the employer company and committed misconduct and sent it to another laboratory. The sample of milk that was taken was neither taken nor sealed in the presence of the employee; it could not be proved that the sample sent was from the same milk which was tested by the job to confirm the accuracy or neutrality. Was not considered by the Labor Court and the employee was not given a copy of the inquiry. Along with the report, another laboratory assistant had endorsed it and the quality control manager had countered it, despite the employee's demand for milk in relation to the milk given to him by the inquiry. What was As a veteran, their validation and response did not make sense to the report submitted by the employees, who reject the report made by a jerk of the pen, in which case, the reasons The fact that there was some truth to the allegation was that the factory general manager was not satisfied with the employee's appointment. The employer failed to show that in order to harm the company and misrepresent itself.
