Section O15 Industrial Relations Ordinance (IV of 2008), Section 41 and 55 General Clauses Act (X of 1897), Section 24A Service Complaint Complaint Employee who has received Pfiling money from the Bank's Treasury The act of the SEC is feeling very dangerous. After submitting the easement, it was stated that the bank employees were dismissed from the charge sheet after the charge sheet and inquiry against them, deliberate fraud and dishonest labor court requested the employee's complaint. Accepted, set aside the dismissal order and ordered the reinstatement of the job when the employee voluntarily confessed to his crime and also collected the misappropriated money, to prove any further evidence to prove the employee's guilt. Was not required, the employee could not show that an inquiry was taken in violation of judicial standards, Yep, that couldn't happen. Emphasize that he was not properly authorized to defend himself was not a Labor Court decision, a Speaker was free of judgment and reasons, and was in breach of the provisions of Section 24A of the General Clause Act and had a stain of discretion. The Labor Court's decision, which did not appear to meet the principles of justice, was set aside and fined. Given to the employee, was retained
