Articles & 322 & & 2 33LL (2) Kital Bism Saba, accused of injury confirmation suspect was not named in FIR, which was filed after initial inquiry based on statements of the victims The accused was involved in the case. An identification parade was held after the arrest of the accused victims, who were also eyewitnesses of the occasion, who for the first time identified the accused before the trial court, but were not acquainted with the accused, he said. I needed collusion, which I did not recognize. The accused before the court was not enough The Investigation Officer failed to collect the main evidence, therefore, the evidence of the witnesses regarding the identity of the accused could not be relied on, therefore, the accused was told to be the owner of the hotel. Was where the victims were riding. The container was moved to and from the deadly voyage, but there was no connection of the accused to the hotel mentioned on the record, so it was not proved that the hotel prosecution failed to link the accused to the commission of the crime. The accused was acquitted on the benefit of the doubt in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
