Section 2 302 (b) Qatil-e-Amad evidence Testimony The benefit of the doubt was that all the witnesses stated that there was no electric light in the house where the incident occurred, which could indicate that the light of the light or any of the accused's identity. There was another source of light for that, even the witnesses did not say that the identity of the accused was not possible in the light of the torch or in the dark night under the light of the moonlight. There will be no conclusion to the claim that he had identified the accused. The realism of it had raised doubts, prosecutors said. C and could not bring the evidence, direct or conditions, which may be linked to the crime basis to suspect the man was standing in the case. In this case, you have seen the FIR registered only on suspicion of the previous enmity between the parties, the claim appeared, which can only be accepted with a lump of salt, saying that the witnesses at the relevant time. The witnesses' statements could not provide evidence of their presence at the site of their presence, but noted contradictions. Medical evidence cannot be relied upon in the report of the Ballistic Expert regarding the recovery of a criminal weapon from the suspect's possession, when he stated that the evidence could not identify or identify the perpetrators of the crime. When, in the presence of eyewitnesses, it was doubted that the prosecutor's story was full of contradictions, contradictions and impossibilities. Eyewitnesses had materially improved their statements at several key points, based on the evidence of such nature, the conviction could not be proved a crime. With a large-scale charge being a crime
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
