Section 302 (b) / 34 Qatl e amd Apprecia tion According to the evidence, the victim's widow was the sole and star witness of the prosecution, but failed to encourage the trust because the ocular account evidence presented by her (the sole witness). Was disconnected by any independent fragment of. No weapons were recovered from the possession of the suspects and there is no report from the forensic science laboratory that cannot confirm the molecular evidence that the medical officer had not examined, no medical evidence, so the property contained between the parties. I can confirm a single civil dispute. And the sole witness was directly interested in seeing that the accused was somehow, or that the other convicted Syed witness has made thorough improvement of the evidence to strengthen the prosecution's case. Such evidence cannot be relied upon as alleged. The prosecution's reliance on the fugitive was not appropriate, as it was not sufficient to prove the person charged, Sid; the accused is consistent with the fugitive's innocence as the defendant's conduct The decision was to be made in light of other evidence which accused the accused on the evidence of the witnesses. He was acquitted and such an inquiry was finalized. The High Court has not challenged the accused, in these circumstances, cannot be convicted on the evidence which had already been rejected by the trial court, the trial court has decided against the accused on the charge of killing the deceased offender. No validation detection was available. He was acquitted by the trial court's improper verdict on the charge of being inadmissible.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
