Section 302 (b) / 149 law martyrdom (10 of 1984), Article 129 (g) Definition of Qatil-Umid evidence Not only did the eyewitness improve his statement during the trial, but he was also a resident. Being remote was an opportunity and did not show any specific reason for being present. The witnesses' behavior on the spot was offensive to normal human behavior and its presence cannot be believed. After two and half hours of filing an FIR, there was a tendency to create a perplexing story, Medical evidence denied ocular testimony, withholding an independent witness mentioned in the FIR by the prosecution was a negative intervention under Article 129. G) Syed Ainid Shahid of the Qanoon martyrdom, Sa 1984 eye Sa, was examined as a defense witness and he categorically stated that the present accused were not guilty in this case, two sticks were recovered as weapons. The O.F. crime did not help the prosecution because they were not shown even with human blood stains. The prosecution's suspicions were met with suspicion, which had to be paid to the accused as the accused was acquitted on the spot. Was.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
