Sections 2 302 (b), 5 315 and 6 316 convictions provided the details of the incident, the conviction of testimony evidence, the lack of prosecution witnesses who claimed to have seen the incident, despite a lengthy cross-examination, in fact the defense. Someone failed to create a distraction. In addition to the witnesses, some of the discriminations that were irrational and not fatal to the evidence were that the witnesses were residents of the adjoining village and that their presence at the scene could not be suspected to be a natural witness, the incident occurred in broad daylight. There was no possibility of mistaken identity, the evidence of the witnesses did not suffer from any material contradiction, contradiction or physical weakness Syed said the witness had a close relationship with the deceased, but only because of his relationship with the deceased, Interested witnesses cannot be declared due to the fact that they have no absence. The direct testimony of a material witness to the accused, who was truthful and whose presence cannot be doubted, cannot be dismissed merely on the basis that he was related and is an interested witness. The statements of his witnesses were proved not only by medical evidence but also by Kalashnikov's release from the suspect's possession. In the positive report of the fireworks expert pointing to her home, further evidence of ocular evidence was confirmed which stated that the two witnesses had been able to prove their case against the accused, in the circumstances of the crime by the accused, Arrested under Section 315, PPC found guilty under Section 316, PPC, which also imposed contempt punishment for extension of up to 25 years after Tauqeer's death. But sir
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
