Section 394 robbery investigation officer's evidence detained the complainant at the police station for about two to two hours, until the complainant prepared a written report affecting the accused in the case, on which the FIR was lodged Had gone, the investigating officer was interested in sentencing. The accused prosecution had stopped and did not present the key witness, the complainant's brother, who was deprived of cash and other valuables during the alleged robbery incident, did not have the effect of recovering any robbery article or weapon from the accused. It was Verify or confirm the prosecution version already existed in police knowledge of the incident, the disclosure memo also did not support the prosecution's case, indicating that the incident did not lead to any recovery but was nothing but a futile exercise. But the accused was acquitted under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
