Sections 4 and 5 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 (d) benefit of the suspect allegedly found in explosives, weapons and ammunition for which he could not furnish any license, There were many contradictions in the prosecution's evidence. Witnesses recovered from the material aspects of the case contradicted each other No site plan was created by the police The entire prosecution's story was unfounded and dishonest and contained material that was recovered. Experts' opinions about this could not be proved. Provided by experts appointed by the provincial or federal government, as required under section 510, the prosecution by the CCPNO bomb disposal technician or the Crisis Management Officer examined whether the authenticity of the said certificate. And to prove legality, the prosecution not only failed to prove the accused's alleged recovery, but he also failed to prove his case, de-shadowing the shadow of doubt. went
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
