Section 302 (b) Qatil Ahmed praised the evidence. The complainant, who was not only a resident of the village concerned, but also with the victim at the time of the incident, fully supported the prosecution's version, narrated a straightforward and confidently inspiring story and conducted a lengthy investigation. Nevertheless, he remained steadfast and nothing was brought on the record to doubt his fact, except that a few minor contradictions affecting the intrinsic value of his statement did not doubt the complainant's presence at the relevant time. Can neither be denied nor denied. Only on the basis that he belonged to the deceased, because he had no ill will or because the accused involved in the commission of the crime did not intend to file an FIR immediately instead of the real culprit. Was done The complainant, who was named before the FIR was filed, was not spoken to by the complainant nor was time taken to leave a witness to the prosecutor's story at the request of the district attorney. Given, his defense was won by defense, the other prosecutor's testimony could not be presented because he had to migrate to an undisclosed destination, saying the witness's non-appearance was neither intentional nor his attempt. Because of the litigation to prevent evidence, being in the light of day, the question of mistaken identity did not arise, for the complainant. A material contradiction in the booth, did not face a conflict or natural weakness, evidence of medical evidence, was supported by the retrieve. Firearm expert shotgun recovered from witnesses' possession and positive report
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
