Section 394, 337A (i), 337A (ii) and 34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 154 of Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13D, voluntarily committing robbery. The testimony of Shuja Gupta, Shiroja Modi and the joint intention to define the evidence was delayed by 5 hours which was not explained. The accused was acquitted by another case under Section 13D, Arms Ordinance, 1965. It was reported that the prosecution's witnesses had been declared admissible prosecutors. In any case, the accused had to be prosecuted in the present case only in the FIR, the name of the accused was not sufficient to prove his guilt, unless it was Don't be proved by mere and reliable evidence. The prosecution did not support the case and did not identify the accused complainant, though the injured were not examined by the prosecution, but no proven evidence was brought to the investigating office. r And the medical officer was a regular witness. The prosecution failed to prove the accused against any reasonable doubt; there was no material available to prove the charge against the trial accused, who was competent and accepted the appeal. Was taken
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
