Find a Lawyer

SHUJAAT HASHMI ALIAS SHUJA versus STATE

Section 497 Preamble Code (XLV of 1860), section 302/34 murder conviction, joint intent to guarantee, involvement in crime for bail was assigned a special role for it The FIR did not provide any details of the accused The accused was first involved in the case on the basis of statements made by the complainant and the prosecution witnesses as subsequent statements were submitted at the postponement stage as the complainant stated in the FIR It was reported that the weapon was recovered without incident. No criminal weapon was recovered from the accused. Details of the accused was the original description of the accused. S does not match the identification parade was held 15 days after the arrest of the accused man was admitted to bail conditions

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• ABID HUSSAIN v. NAWAB 2013 YLR 1609
• MIR MUHAMMAD alias MIR v. State 2013 MLD 1609
• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE-II, KARACHI v. ROYAL INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGE COMPANY (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI 2013 PTD 1614
• Mst. SHAMIM ARA v. DISTRICT COORDINATOR through Officers 2013 YLR 1615
• MUMTAZ ALI v. State 2013 YLR 1619
• Syed AHMED ALI v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER 2013 MLD 1625
• Mst. NAILA ASHAR v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1627
• NAZEER MOOSA v. MUHAMMAD IQBAL 2013 YLR 1629

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

top advocate from Mingora lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes