Find a Lawyer

ABID HUSSAIN versus NAWAB

The appellant failed to cite any evidence against section 417 (2A) being bad, which could be convinced that the indication drawn by the trial court was against the principles of the definition of evidence, while the accused. Can be forgiven. It is said that it is not irreversible and appeals against evil for reasons that are imaginary, liking, speculative and artificial.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• DEEDAR v. ABDULLAH 2013 PCrLJ 1593
• ASIF v. Mst. SANGEETA 2013 CLC 1597
• ABDUL KARIM v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1600
• Hafiz MEHBOOB v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Revenue Board of Revenue 2013 MLD 1602
• MIR MUHAMMAD alias MIR v. State 2013 MLD 1609
• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE-II, KARACHI v. ROYAL INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGE COMPANY (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI 2013 PTD 1614
• Mst. SHAMIM ARA v. DISTRICT COORDINATOR through Officers 2013 YLR 1615
• SHUJAAT HASHMI alias SHUJA v. State 2013 MLD 1615

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

best law firm from Tando Allahyar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes