Find a Lawyer

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE-II, KARACHI versus ROYAL INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGE COMPANY (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI

Section 133 Reference to the facts found and accepted by the appellate tribunal In such facts, the High Court scope High Court may consider only the question of law or the reading of any material evidence by the tribunal will be a question of law. The High Court shall be bound to accept such facts

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• ABDUL KARIM v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1600
• Hafiz MEHBOOB v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Revenue Board of Revenue 2013 MLD 1602
• ABID HUSSAIN v. NAWAB 2013 YLR 1609
• MIR MUHAMMAD alias MIR v. State 2013 MLD 1609
• Mst. SHAMIM ARA v. DISTRICT COORDINATOR through Officers 2013 YLR 1615
• SHUJAAT HASHMI alias SHUJA v. State 2013 MLD 1615
• MUMTAZ ALI v. State 2013 YLR 1619
• Syed AHMED ALI v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER 2013 MLD 1625

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

immigration advocates contact from Kahror Pacca lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes