HAFIZ MEHBOOB versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY, REVENUE BOARD OF REVENUE
A. VII, R 11 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), the claimant claiming the dismissal of the plaintiff's notice to indicate the limitation of section 42 suit land, moved the petition to dismiss the plaintiff on the basis on which the section The case was stopped by 42. In the Special Relief Act, 1877, the defendant believed that the defendant had encroached upon his land. Defendant's defendant did not dispute the plaintiff's applicant's ownership dispute regarding the survey number or anything mentioned in the notice of appeal. The land owned by the defendant, in addition to the survey numbers shown in the memorandum of appeal by the plaintiff applicant, allegedly exceeded by the applicant in order to ascertain whether the claim of the defendant was true. Whether or not notice was issued to the plaintiff applicants, the limitation of the respondents for re-assessment of the boundaries of the land belonging to the plaintiff applicants and the defendants will eliminate the issue and if after the delimitation the claimant has proceedings with the applicants. If there is any reason, they can approach the relevant court and at such a stage Eric choke in the action in pursuit of notice would not be appropriate. The plaintiff's applicants were not denied or threatened with any legal right or title to the plaintiffs in the plaintiff's notice, and the trial court correctly and properly found that the plaintiffs 'applicants' lawsuit was filed by the plaintiff of the Special Relief Act, 1877 The applicants were barred under section 42. Claim petitioner's trial court application under AC VIC, R 11, CPC
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
