Section 302 (b) and 365 A Qtl e amd, no rehabilitation counseling was prepared for the ransom to be applauded for kidnapping, or when the suspects were arrested at the police station. There was an empty hand, and no one was recovered. During the alleged confrontation between the police and the robbers, they were fired and no one was injured. During the trial, the two kidnappers did not identify the suspects in which contradictions were made in connection with the arrest or recovery of the accused, raising serious suspicion in the prosecution case. One of the kidnappers said that the kidnappers were chained, but according to the prosecutor's witness statement, when the hostages were recovered, they were not chained. It cannot be said that he Has been able to prove the matter without reasonable doubt. There were cases which raised suspicion in the prosecution case. The accused cannot be deprived of the benefit of the doubt. The prosecutor did not succeed in proving his case beyond reasonable doubt against the accused. Was heard, there was a disputed decision of the unwarranted verdict. The trial was held in court, the accused were acquitted and released.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
