After agreeing to the police report by the magistrates of Sections 190 (1), 173 and 561, the scope magistrate confessed to the police report without giving reasons for disagreeing with the police report. The names of the accused persons / applicants were placed in the column as number 2 of the challan as the investigating officer stated that there was insufficient evidence against them before the magistrate complainant also filed a written complaint before the magistrate, who After agreeing to the police report, ordered to issue a non-bailable warrant against the accused. The reason for such disagreement and the indictment of the accused without hearing the accused persons was that the unauthorized order of the magistrate was clear and vague, and the magistrate was obliged to consider the material collected during the investigation. And then he had to go through a fair, fair and speechless. Order Accuracy Magistrate did not consider this type of material was collected during the investigation as there were no reasons for disagreement with the inquiry officer's opinion on his unidentified order and the order of the magistrate was found to be arbitrary and under the High Court. The hereditary jurisdiction may be revoked under section 6161uris A, CRPC's restraining order magistrate was directed by a competent court to the extent of issuing a non-bailable warrant arrest against the offender. Appropriate and bid based on concrete reasons for the report submitted by the Investigation Officer under CR PC Shoot sighting in the same order and to provide the complainant with the complaint, hearing the parties the opportunity offered by
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
