Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

YASIR ARFAT versus CHIEF POST MASTER, G.P.O., HYDERABAD


Section 2, 2A and 4 Workmen's Compensation Act (VIII of 1923), Schedule II, CL (xiii) Appeal to the Service Tribunal Qualification Appellant, in this case, was admittedly an employee who was a total of Schedule II ( Xiii). In the circumstances of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923, the appellant was not a public servant under section 2 (1) (b) of the Civil Servants Act, 1973, the appellant filed an appeal under section 4 under which section 2 of the Service Tribunals Act 1973 Was read, but should have. The above was filed under section 2A of the Act and not under section 2 because it was declared ultra vires by the Supreme Court under Section 2A of the Labor Service Tribunals Act 1973, the appeal was permanent. Can stand. Authorized Labor Court \ r \ n

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
ask a advocate free from Bannu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.