RAHIM BUX versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS KARACHI
Rr 3 (1) (b), 4 (1) (b) (iii) and 5 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Service Removal Charge sheeting is a major punishment for dismissal, but holding. Investigation of any department related to allegations of corruption without preliminary investigation, even though the accused was charged against him, while appellant denied all the allegations leveled against him and examined the witnesses. No opportunity was given to investigate, it was absolutely necessary to conduct regular departmental inquiry. Appeal to the applicant at home. Initial inquiry against the appellant was dismissed. It was not enough to impose a huge fine and any possibility of presenting his defense to the appellant's punitive action against him was excluded and he was severely punished for his removal. Appellant's removal order was set with the direction of the AU, with the permission of the unwanted order of appeal. The urge to restore the appellant from the date of his dismissal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
