AQEEL AHMED versus CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN STEEL, KARACHI
Sections 3, 5 and 10 of the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), after the appellant commissioned the appellants to charge them and to investigate and misuse them under allegations of misconduct. Was removed from The appellant had served 26 years in which the role of appellant was assigned with a record of unstructured service and it was proved against him that the proceedings of the inquiry were to sign some documents on the occasion of other officers. I was told that the appellant was not taking advantage of the alleged financial scam case. The appellant was matched by other employees whose major sentence of dismissal from employment was changed to prevent three increments for a period of three years as the appellant's case was similar to that of other employees and in other mitigating circumstances. In this case, the penalty for removal from his post was amended. Authorities conducting his three increments for a period of three years have been directed to dismiss the appellant from the job. Restore from date of operation. The duration of the intervention will be considered a leave that can be caused by the appellant.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
