SHAFI MUHAMMAD versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD. THROUGH MEMBER (AMDN.) PTCL HEADQUARTERS, ISLAMABAD
R 4 (1) (b) (i) Removal of Service (Special Powers) Ordinance (XVII of 2000), Section 11 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 upside-down penalties and the application of the receipt of money Applicable to the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, the applicant imposed two fines on reversal and recovery of money, but on the departmental appeal, the order for reversal was set aside, but the order for collection of money was retained. , And the appellant filed an appeal against this order. The validity case was a misuse of the law because the charge sheet and imposing fines under the Public Employees (Discipline and Discipline) Rules 1973 were issued at a time when the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance 2000 Was abolished. Has been issued; and under section 11 of this ordinance, the ordinance reverses any other law for the time being punished against a civil servant, in the circumstances of which the offense is reversed and reversed on appeal. In order to recover the money owed, the authority was appointed, however, to conduct de novo proceedings against the appellant for the recovery of the money, withdrew from service within the specified period (special powers) under the Ordinance 2000. It will be free to take action.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
