Find a Lawyer

BASHARAT HUSSAIN versus CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN STEEL, KARACHI

Sections 4 (1) (B) (C), 5 (1) (A) and 10 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Demonstration Appeal charged after appellant was charged with the crime. Was conducted and an inquiry was held against him. Charges that he had previously used additional government means to obtain seniority and subsequently the appellant was acquitted of the charges against him in the departmental inquiry, violating the relevant rules, but the competent authority inquired Did not accept the officer's recommendation and ordered de novo to have a departmental inquiry into which the appellant was indicted and, after issuing a cap notice and his personal hearing, imposed a fine on the appellant. There was no action against the two other employees, who were called up Along with the creditor, the accused / accused was convicted, the appellant, without a motive, was subjected to the worst kind of discrimination in the circumstances as he was the only person who was punished for no hard reason. The order of penalty imposed against the appellant was merely stated that on the basis of discrimination, the injunction against the appellant to demolish the appellant has been directed to the appellant with the benefit of all the consequences. To restore its original position. criminal advocate from Kot Ghulam Mohd lawyer