Find a Lawyer

TASNEEM AHMED versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FOOD, AGRICULTURE AND LIVESTOCK, ISLAMABAD

Sections 2 (AA), 3, 5 and 10 of the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 apply for the enhancement prevention sentence after issuing a show cause notice to the appellant, but without restraint. The objection was raised by the prosecuting attorney's counsel regarding allegations of incompetence and misconduct against him by the inquiry officer or the inquiry committee. This flawed order was not issued by the competent authority and for the period in which the injunction to stop the increment was not mentioned, the authorities regarding the lawsuit punished the appellant according to law. Did not take action or gave no satisfactory answer. The objection regarding the relevant authorized authority secretary department was the authorized authority in this case, but the show cause notice was issued by the director general of the department to the appellant which was not the authorized authority show cause notice which, in the circumstances, was void and void, Appeals filed by the appellant against the illegal order were allowed in the eyes and the authorities were instructed to pay the appellant all private benefits from the date of the illegal order. \ r \ n female advocates from Patoki lawyer