ALI MUHAMMAD versus DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, KARACHI
Sections 3, 5 (4) and 10 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Service Exemption Appeal was dismissed after issuing a job, but was charged with misconduct. Without regular investigation against The appellant was convicted on the basis of a preliminary inquiry, yet serious allegations of misappropriation of money against the appellant were denied, yet no reason for regular investigation was shown against the appellant. Was. In order to thwart the proceedings against the appellant, the unclean order of dismissal from the job sanctioned by the appellant by the authorities could not be maintained, in which case the authorities were directed to reinstate the appellant on the same charges. And take disciplinary action against De Novo. Charges within a specified period
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
