Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANIF versus CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN STEEL, KARACHI

In Section 3 and 10 of the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), the appellant was removed from service by the appellant on the charge that he was a custody officer to ensure the loading of the proper equipment on the truck. I failed, what appellant's lawyer did not press the appeal, but prayed to amend his sentence, the appellant requested that he not be present when he was loading the truck. He had duties to supervise the two places where appellant requested that he be removed from office. Not only his service, but his family will also face financial difficulties and separation. And he had to suffer from the job because he was not likely to get a suitable job because of his old age, the appellant's lawyer prayed that the appellant's compassionate case restored the appellant and consider him sympathetic. Which has led to the amendment of the sentence. Earlier, the inquiry officer recommended that the appellant's removal order be set aside and that the assistant manager amend his dismissal sentence for a period of two years. The pay scale will be reduced by one step. Service from the date of its removal, with the benefits of a return according to the scale of the lower compensation ask a advocate free from Dera Ghazi Khan lawyer