Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (LAW AND ORDER), LAHORE AND 2 OTHERS

Section 3, 5, 6 and 10 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), section 4 sentenced the appellant, who was given a previous leave of 90 days, to be punished for the change in sentence from the punishment for reduction in pay. The overseas appellant even after his previous departure from Pakistan, remained absent for a year and was dismissed for employment on account of an unauthorized absence from duty appellant, who claimed that he was a The accident victim and sustained injuries sustained treatment, the Medical Certificate Appeal Authority acknowledged. Medical certificate restores appellant to employment. His absence was considered a leave without pay. And the punishment for his dismissal was turned into a pay cut. The appellant filed an appeal against the appellate authority's decision, alleging that when the appellate authority had considered the absence of the appellant without pay, he could not be prosecuted. The alleged unauthorized absence justification for the same period when the departmental appellate authority itself treated the period during which the appellant appeared or was absent without pay, leaving him at the same time. Could not be fined for the alleged unauthorized absence. His alleged absence, considered to be unpaid leave), could have been intentionally absent or left on leave at the same time \ on leave and \ on leave, but No penalty for reduction of salary simultaneously. advocate for immigration from Haripur lawyer