MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE/DEPUTY COMMANDANT, PUNJAB CONSTABULARY HEADQUARTERS, FAROOQABAD
Sections 3, 5 and 10 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), the appellant serving as a constable, was dismissed from service after issuing a show cause notice, but was discharged from duty. On the basis of his presence, without any inquiry against him, the appellant had confirmed his absence for 253 days, which required inquiry as to the amount of punishment, if any, different from that. May be, but no formal inquiry has been made in this case; available records indicate that the authorized authority is subject to formal inquiry before proceeding. For Lee to release the recorded reasons for the appellant, which made the entire process unsuccessful. Otherwise, it was appropriate that formal inquiries should be made on major fines, this score should be dealt with. Taken against the appellant, the imposed orders passed against the appellant were set aside, the appellant was reinstated and the case remanded. To the authority authorized to proceed in accordance with the law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Sialkot lawyer