Find a Lawyer

SHAHID NAEEM versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL EXCISE AND TAXATION PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

Section 2 (A) and Punjab Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 4444), notice of the reason for dismissal of section 4 service was imposed on the appellant, but the misconduct was given. Without holding a grudge against them. Bad credit authority did not discuss the merits of the case while issuing penalty orders, although it was mentioned in the penalty orders, but no evidence was given regarding the service of said notice. The hearing, then, should have chosen an earlier action and the order should have been passed, keeping the evidence on record and the material evidence. The department did not approve the orders keeping in view the response of the appellant and the departmental evidence, the previous orders of the authority against the appellant were grossly against the provisions. Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, Removal of Punjab from 2000 The whole process was one-sided and the appellant was not a viable opportunity for defense; without the defense of the appellant such orders were illegal, both the orders of the departmental authorities on one side. The appellant was reinstated, a regular inquiry was ordered and the interrogation period would be decided as a result of the investigation. top advocates from Kotla lawyer