Find a Lawyer

MIRZA MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus ADDITIONAL SECRETARY (GENERAL), GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, (SCHOOL WING), LAHORE

Rr 3 & 4 (1) (a) (ii) Punjab Civil Servants Act (XIII of 1974), Section 21 Punjab Civil Servants Pension Rules, 1955, R 1 8 pension restriction was banned from the appellant. After issuing showcase notices to him and inquiring against him on allegations that he made some irregular teacher appointments and gave PTC regular grades on the basis of fake and fake PTC result cards. And was also drawing money as loan against TA / DA bills and was not returned due to notice of cause for more than three years after his retirement under R1 8 of Punjab Civil Servant Pension Rules 1955. A. Was submitted on the Elements, if any order relating to the prevention of pension or any part thereof was issued to the person concerned, in the present period the authorities recorded without cause and without finding in favor of the appellant without pension. The amount was withheld because the matter was a decision in the High Court. rt It cannot be said that the appellant's embezzlement amount was the basis of embezzlement as the authorities on record did not prove any facet of the embezzlement, only the irregularities made by the appellant were inaccurate. The head was receiving money so that the matter should be investigated through regular process. Inquiries when the appellant was in employment, but proceedings were initiated against him after 3 years of retirement. advocate from Jhand lawyer