Find a Lawyer

JAVED IQBAL versus DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE SARGODHA RANGE, SARGODHA

RR 4 and 6 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Appellant was prosecuted on two counts by the two accused for the reduction of pay penalty to arrest the accused and in the case. The invoice was submitted. But he failed to follow the instructions of his senior officers, and so he committed mismanagement. The appellant was issued a show cause notice and the allegations against him were regularly investigated. In the appeal before the service tribunal was accused of reduction in salary, the issue related to the arrest of the accused in the order was also pending before the appellant's posting before another police officer. But only action was taken against the appellant, which was discriminatory and the appellant against it. I also raised serious objections. The manner in which the inquiry was conducted by a Section P, who was a new queer and failed to link appellant with the process Dingus and did not give him the opportunity to be examined by any witness was accepted and his appeal was accepted. Accordingly, the relevant authority was remanded for fresh remedial action against the appellant. top civil advocates from Sehar Baqlas lawyer