MUHAMMAD ISMAIL AND 2 OTHERS versus DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER (M-EE), KASUR AND 3 OTHERS
Sections 3, 5, 6 and 13 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), after appellant's charge sheet and inquiry against him, he was dismissed from his job to receive bogus appointment as a PTC teacher. Have been able to do that. The Inquiry Committee required the appellant to answer certain questions in writing, without proper inquiry, instead of recording witness statements and allowing appellants to examine them, regulated against appeals by the Inquiry Committee. Inquiries were made, the inquiry committee should have written a statement of authority which had initially appointed the appellants and the appellants should have been allowed to be examined. The officer said that if the authority felt that the inquiry was wrong in any case If so, the DOO inquiry should have ordered the orders from them Was separated from the date of his release and he was reinstated from the date of his removal from service, however, the administration was instructed to make regular inquiries under applicable laws and regulations and so on. The final form must be finalized during which the appellants stay away from employment. Due to unpaid fines, the outcome of a regular investigation will depend
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Lakimarwat lawyer