Find a Lawyer

NIAZ ALI LUND versus CHIEF MINISTER, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, KARACHI AND 2 OTHERS

R9A Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 Indicates the employment of a surplus pool in the lower level appellant Appellant, who served as the Manager (Corporate Affairs) at B18 in the Sugar Corporation, Paul Appellant was later absorbed as Administrator Officer in the Department of Finance's Accounts and Inspection Department at B-17, he was not satisfied with such absorption and was unable to absorb the Service Tribunal Validity Appellant at a lower scale. Before the Appeal was filed because there was a vacant Appeal Appeal of the Basic Scale 18, in the circumstances Indus slept According to R9A Clause (ii) of the L'Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Exchange) Rules 1974, it was properly absorbed in Basic Scale 17 that the Appellant concludes that there is a designation in the Basic Scale 18 in the Department of Culture and Tourism. The Administrative Officer / Deputy Director (Admin) was vacant and the Appellant was also fit and competent. Lee was repulsed for the above post, because at the time it was said that the post was not vacant, another of his colleagues, who was younger, was appointed deputy director in the Basic Scale 18 in the Directorate of Manpower. Was absorbed as But the appellant was ignored and discriminated against, he was repelled, for the simple reason that there was no rule that additional pool staff would be absorbed in other departments according to the sanity. property advocates from Dir lawyer