Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF ZAFAR versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, HEALTH DEPARTMENT, LAHORE

Section 3 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), the imposition of a fine on the removal of section 4 mismanagement services, was subsequently canceled by the appellant after the leave of the appellant and consequently the order of cancellation. The department was sent to the appellant and as a result, the appellant was instructed to resume duties, the appellant was instructed to resume the duties, despite being absent from duty, the mismanagement was still pending. That he had gone abroad without obtaining approval from the competent authority; Yes, it was. It was prosecuted on a disciplinary basis, keeping in view the applicant's 17 years of service, could have been less punishable in the event of a mandatory retirement, however, a decree passed by the authority could be effective with the enforcement order. Was approved and cannot be effective from the same date, the date imposed on the appellant by the departmental authority was changed to compulsory retirement after which the competent authority ordered that the interim period, however, be paid. Without leave will be considered best advocate from Sehar Baqlas lawyer