ZAKA ULLAH BAJWA versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY, PUBLIC PROSECUTION DEPARTMENT, LAHORE
Article 8 and 3 of the Punjab Civil Servants (Qualification and Discipline) Rules, 1999, R4 (2) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Request for the post of Deputy Prosecutor General (BS18), recommended by the Public Service Commission The appointment of the petitioner, but the refusal of the provincial government to issue a letter of inquiry against them and the registration of a criminal case against them, and the request for their removal from the controversial service, were that the service tribunal dismissed from service. Was sentenced to one increment. For one year, the Validity Public Service Commission offered applicants a conditional confirmation of their educational qualifications, and the information presented by them was stopped by the competent authority after the applicant's appointment order. Revealed a criminal case against him and a criminal case against him. His petitioner neither disclosed the facts of the inquiry and the criminal case, nor did he lie for such a post with the permission of the authority appointed under R8 of the App Punjab Civil Service (Application for Posts) Rules, 1987 Has been called, but no offer of appointment will make any candidate in favor of any candidate and such change by the Tribunal will mean change. Some allegations against the applicants were proved, the High Court could not, in the constitutional jurisdiction, compel the department to appoint any person who the department did not agree to the appointment because of negative entries in its previous service record and the criminal case. I was unable to establish the accused in such a position, thus, the question of infringement would not arise, the constitutional jurisdiction
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
