Find a Lawyer

SAFDAR HUSSAIN versus SUB-DIVISIONAL CANAL OFFICER

Article A Section A Constitution of Pakistan, Article 68A of the Constitution High High Inter Constitution High Court for the restoration of the interrupted supply of intermediary supplies, with the sole purpose of section 68A of the Canal and Drainage Act, 1873 To provide interim relief to the fields in unauthorized conditions. The obstruction or disruption of the Water Course Order states that the provisions were finalized and could not be interfered with by constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution unless it was proved that it was expressly unlawful. Was legal or the landlord was not provided with a hearing. Or that the required inquiry was not made before the order was passed by the canal officer

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• ABDUL RAZZAQ v. Mst. MEHR KHATOON 2013 YLR 341
• ALLAH DITTA v. State 2013 PCrLJ 342
• Barrister SARDAR MUHAMMAD v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2013 PLD 343
• ZAKA ULLAH BAJWA v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary, Public Prosecution Department, Lahore 2013 PLC(CS) 344
• MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. Hafiz MUHAMMAD ISMAIL 2013 CLD 349
• SULTAN alias SULLI v. State 2013 YLR 350
• Raja MUHAMMAD NASIR KHAN v. ACTING VICE-CHANCELLOR 2013 PLC(CS) 353
• ZULFIQAR ALI v. State 2013 PCrLJ 358

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

Pakistan, top advocate family court from Kalam lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes