BARRISTER SARDAR MUHAMMAD versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Sections 3 (3) and (4) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 (1) (B) (ii) Constitutional Appointment Chairman of Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA), Legislative Appointment ?? Conflicts of Interest Chairman Chairman ula regulatory arrest, the concept of scope response sat in the chairmanship of Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (PTCL), and during this period the Establishment Division established its membership for Member of Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA). Resigned as respondents by suggesting name. His appointment as Chairman PTCL and Member and Chairman PTA was a surprising and somewhat dubious harmony, meaning that both actions took place on the same day, the PTCL Board of Directors responded. Ali's time, in the past months, had tied it into a formal bond. In addition to avoiding the Company's strategic vision and future financial planning with PTCL, establishing such relationships and relationships with respondents / business relationships with PTCL and, more importantly, The thing is, an impression about the business relationship, therefore, was that it was immoral and offensive that the respondents, the respondents, on the day he resigned as Chairman PTCL, were appointed PTA Chairman. Which was a high regulatory authority. The telecommunication sector has, in the past, treated the appointment of respondents, as well as telecommunications service users, as well as for the interests of PTCL and its subsidiaries, as well as telecommunication service providers. It seems shocking
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
