Section 2 (2 (b)) of the nature of the evidence appreciated the benefit of the doubt The nighttime post-mortem report Determining the time of death The defendant was convicted and imprisoned under Section 2 30 (b), PPC. The conviction, which was unusual but unusual, witnessed in the torch light not only identified four people but also noted the wounds inflicted on various parts of the body of the deceased in the dark night. According to witnesses, eyewitnesses claimed to have seen the incident from a distance of about 20 feet - which was not possible, and that too was the noise of dogs barking in the torch. For this reason only eye witnesses were awake but he did not attract the deceased. All such facts show that there were no eyewitnesses present on the night of the strange night and they were present later. The account was purchased by the prosecution and the prosecutor could not make his presence on the spot, according to a post-mortem examination, Saint Moutefi's milk had digestive tract and it was impossible that at 3 in the morning, the stomach had digested food. Because it was common practice in the village that people used to eat at night, in the evening. The detainee may have indicated that he had eaten dinner around 5/6 pm and his death occurred around 9 pm later, the prosecution failed to prove his case against the accused. Reasonable Suspicion The High Court took advantage of the suspect and acquitted him of the charge
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
