Sections 13 and 5 of the suit on the Student / Mohibit / Jumping Demand were decided simultaneously by the occupant at the same time The defendant's claim was that the plaintiff had no mention of the date, time and place of the unknown sale. was not. Mention the same in the plaintiffs' notice as well as prove it by means of evidence. At the present time, it was necessary to prove the student's affidavit. The plaintiff cannot state that he did not prove his claim of illegal sale and therefore demanded to jump, that he did not assert his right pursuant to Section 13 of the Punjab Pre-Impression Act, 1991, when he had no knowledge of any of the claimants. No date was given. Or notice below that the finding of the courts was wrong that the High Court put aside the concurrent search of the courts which allowed review, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
