RAJA MUHAMMAD NASIR KHAN versus ACTING VICE-CHANCELLOR
Sections 12, 10 and 18 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution of the Vice Chancellor of the Educational Institution Vice-Chancellor and the appointment of the Vice Chancellor Petitioners on this basis invalidated the appointment of the acting Vice-Chancellor as Defendant. According to which appointment was not made. According to the prescribed procedure and the post of Vice-Chancellor has been vacant for two years. Under the Wah Chancellor's University Wave Act, 2009, the term was designated as a position, while the acting Vice-Chancellor was temporarily administered until the appointment. The acting Vice-Chancellor of the Vice-Chancellor was made available for interim, so the final powers of the Act Vice-Chancellor were defined by the Board established under the University WOW Act, 2009 for a specified period. Was gone A university that operates without its Vice-Chancellor indefinitely and in the present case, after a serious search by the Vice-Chancellor, it is said that two positions cannot be equated because one post was declared a university officer. And the other (acting Vice-Chancellor) was bound. The empowered instrument established under the Board of Wow Act, 2009 was no longer provided to the Office of the Acting Vice-Chancellor, as in the present case, the Acting Vice-Chancellor will not be a substitute. The Chancellor's High Court approved the respondent's appointment order without legal authority and without following the procedure and rules under the University Wave Act, 2009, the High Court further directed the concerned authority to submit to the Vice Chancellor in accordance with the prescribed procedure. Appointment in the Constitution
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
