Find a Lawyer

DR. MRS. FARRUKH TAHIR versus ALLAMA IQBAL OPEN UNIVERSITY

Rr 3 (b), 4 (1) (b) (iii) (iv) and 5 (iii) (Service of Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)), rejecting section 4 / dismissal of service against penal exchange. After the notice of appeal was issued to the appellant, his dismissal was imposed on the appellant, but without the inquiry into the allegations of corruption against him, during the hearing of the appellant's appeal, the authority to dismiss the service was dismissed. From Compassion to Employment (termination). The ground allegation against the appellant was that she referred directly to higher and external authorities. Wild and baseless allegations of violating the rules against the usual communication channel and various university officials / officials were terminated on the basis of the availability of documentary evidence on a regular inquiry record against the appellant. Regular investigations of allegations made against the accused employee, especially where there was a factual dispute between the employee and the employer appellant, in the present case, the prosecution, enmity and retaliation against the accused / vice chancellor and others. Has allegedly raised serious factual controversy. Such a situation was sufficient for a regular inquiry in this case, the appellant was given full opportunity of a personal hearing, but no formal investigation was ordered nor conducted in this case, The patent was illegal, due to which there was no legitimate use of the law. Imposing a huge fine on the appellant suicide and the subsequent development of the appellant's case, the appellant cannot be ignored, along with that, the entire job. inheritance advocates near Gohar Ghoushti lawyer