Find a Lawyer

LAL KHAN WARSI versus CHAIRMAN PAKISTAN STEEL, KARACHI AND 2 OTHERS

Sections 3, 5, 6 and 10 were dismissed after the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Miscellaneous Demotion Appeals, for issuing notice of cause and conducting an inquiry into the gross negligence and allegations of duty. The appellants were accused of corruption. That he was a member of an inquiry committee failed to properly analyze the evidence brought to the inquiry record, suppressing the facts and concluding that any justification was empty. Failure to properly inquire against the Inquiry Officer The standard procedure in such cases was that the competent authority would assign an investigation to another officer so that the prosecution could face another legal weakness. Read. A copy of the Dow was not provided to the appellants of the showcase notice, the report of the Sufism inquiry into which their case was prejudiced, was also not available to the appellant for a personal hearing before imposing a reduced sentence on the appellant. That the principles of natural justice were negated, the decree passed against the appellants, was left to the authorities. Restore the appellants to their original post with all the resulting benefits from random order history. top advocates from Bajaur lawyer