SYED UMER ZAFAR NAQVI versus CHAIRMAN PAKISTAN STEEL
After filing a showcase notice to reduce the lack of appeal from the Section 4 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), the Section 4 Deputy Manager to the Assistant Manager and questioning that the Appellant made his presence known. Not checked / put your signature in the attendance register. During the entire months of July and August 2001, the main point involved in the case was that the appellant did not sign the attendance register as stated in the allegations, while the inquiry into the Attendance Register of the Daily Wage Employees was completed. , Which was a serious legal weakness. There was no mention of allegations about the appellant's signature or the showcase notice for two months on the Delegates' Attendance Register, calling all inquiry proceedings invalidated, the appellant said in his reply to his daily wage Not marking attendance. Registers, but the officers were putting their signature in the Permanent Register of Attendance Regular Officers' Register shows that the Appellant has been entering his signature on the Permanent Registration of his employees. The appellant did not mark his attendance in the attendance register for the entire two months, which was a wrong order to subpoena the appellant from the Deputy Manager to the Assistant Manager. Was illegal, and now the original invalid order was set aside and the appellant was restored to its original status and entitled to all c9nqu supplementary benefits from the date of the inadmissible injunction. It was restored to its original condition.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Hub Inds Estate lawyer