Find a Lawyer

AHMED BARCH versus CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN STEEL, KARACHI

More than five months after the arrest of a section O-12 employee who was arrested in a criminal case against him, he was presented with a showcase notice in jail, a response to the notice by the jail administration. Was given by the employee in which the employee requested an unusual leave for one. For one year, the employer did not have access to a one-year leave at the employee's request and instead approved a two-month leave so that his guarantee could be approved if his services were terminated. If employers did not take any action after the expiry of two months. And finally one year, three months and five days after the arrest of the employee, his services were terminated because the employees were arrested in connection with a murder, he was not sure about the criminal prosecution. To arrive at the final result, the employees waited for the release of the employee for fifteen months and the five days was a reasonable time because the employer could not wait for the employees permanently. In accordance with the Rules of Procedure and that this action of employers was strictly in accordance with the relevant law, namely in accordance with Standing Order 12 (1) The Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, has been legally employed over 1968 employees. This service termination order cannot be interrupted. \ R \ n jobs for fresh advocates from Upper Dir lawyer