Find a Lawyer

AHSANULLAH KHAN versus CHAIRMAN,CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD

Prior to the service tribunal complaint regarding the R7 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Promotional Intelligence Appellant, it was appealed that its juniors be promoted to BPS 17 and later to BPS 18. Were given, but both times they were ignored and were not considered. Promotion from BPS 16 to 17 and then from 17 bps to 18 was suspended due to prolonged disciplinary proceedings against them, but the assurance given to them on their representation. Despite this, they were not given the development that they would be justified in development. The obstruction of the disciplinary proceedings against the appellant was removed and the appellant consequently had the right to consider promotion with sanity and financial benefits, even when directed to his retirement department. He was to present the Appellant's case to the ACM in the relevant AC which will be considered. The Appellant's case for promotion to the Department will promote the appellant's pro-activeness from the date on which it was due, and will result in payment of the financial benefits arising from it. Appellant, who was a senior government employee, will be deemed to have been promoted to BPS 17 from the date of development of his juniors. In the financial incentives beginning on this date, when it was promoted to promote BPS 17 to 18, the authorities were instructed to put the matter before the Public Promotion Committee with all relevant ACs. ? \ r \ n \ r \ n how to become a advocate from Bolan lawyer