Find a Lawyer

INSPECTOR IRSHAD AHMED SOHAIL versus CAPITAL CITY POLICE OFFICER/ADDL. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE KARACHI

RR 3 and 4 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), reduction of rank appeal against Section 4 Appellant while appointed as Inspector / Charge Investigation, he was prosecuted on the ground that his Due to faculty / defective investigations, lack of supervision and lack of interest, he was unable to successfully conduct a high profile criminal case and was thoroughly investigated in this case, resulting in the accused in this case. Was acquitted, but appellant was granted a personal hearing, but he was unable to convince the Deputy Inspector General of Police. There was work, the sub-inspector appellant was denied major penalties for any reduction in status, (the Department of Appeal, which received no response, filed an appeal before the service tribunal appellant, which was called Section 6). An FIR investigation was assigned under F / 7 (A). To appear before the relevant court against the designated defendants of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, at any interval before the relevant court, in fact due to their ineligibility, negligence or negligence to make further or legal action by the appellant. Later, they could be held guilty for the five persons whose main reason was the negligence, negligence and inability of the appellant due to the lack of investigation by the appellant. The simple fact is that he could not even bother to verify the prosecution's parents, the sole independent and star witnesses of the case, who spoke a lot about his own negligence, in the circumstances, against the department and the fine. The right action was taken for him advocate from Mansehra lawyer