MUHAMMAD BILAL KHAN SEHRAI versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND ANOTHER
Section 9 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Appeal of the cancellation order of Section 4 Order Appellant serving as Deputy Education Officer in B17, formally pursuing Education in B 18 on the recommendation of the Department Publicity Committee. The rank of officer was promoted. His salary was set accordingly, but about 5/2 months after his promotion, his promotional order was canceled under notification, without notice for any reason and the opportunity for a personal hearing. Provided Appellant was promoted to the post of legal and legal development without providing all codal formal inspections provided by Law 18, the officer in B18 proceeded, examined and considered by the Promotion Committee concerned Who thoroughly examined the applicant's credentials and other qualifications etc. and then said that his name was recommended for development and asked Appropriately approved by the competent authority appellant who has acquired valuable and deserving rights, I could not be withdrawn without issuing the showcase notice and the opportunity of hearing, but any opportunity for the appellant for the appellant. Was provided otherwise he was competent and capable of promotion, his promotion was legitimate, legal and perfect and he had to apply / apply the circumstances to the appellant, who had obtained a legal and valuable right. Under the doctrine of positivist docs he could not be snatched away, an unclean order which the appellant approved without hearing. Someone whose presence was necessary before the relevant authorities, it was hatred in his eyes. Notice of law / order under which the promotional order was canceled,
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Shamsabad lawyer