Find a Lawyer

ABDUL NAEEM SIDDIQUI versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPECIAL BRANCH, HYDERABAD

R13 18 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 Regularly exchanges with the Police Force for promotion and certification of Special Branch Claims, Appellant Appointed as Constable in Regular Police Force, almost 4 years after Special Moved to branch. The appointment with the clear order that the appellant would get the lowest position in the seniority of the Special Branch Constables was promoted as the head constable in the Special Branch and then as Assistant Sub Inspector Playa of Authorities. The Special Appellant was transferred to the Special Branch and the subsequent promotions were strengthened. He was senior to the appellant on breach of the rules and on purely political grounds and on the basis of preliminary appointments to the appellants of the private respondent Special Branch, claiming that the date of completion of the test period in this post was confirmed. A section will be done as Eye. Declaring the undisclosed seniority list in the post of Head Coon was stable on the date it was promoted, a clear violation of the R13% of the Police Rules 1934 under which the Appellant Was required to hold a probationary position for at least two years, even to complete a successful investigation. The matter will certainly not be confirmed unless there is a regular slot for this purpose, the probation period can be extended, but by no means, the rapid increase of the appellant in the Special Branch was waived. Or where he issued a deposition from Constable to A. Section I, less than six months ago, was neither lasting nor abiding in the rules. female advocates from Mian Walli lawyer