Find a Lawyer

ATTA MUHAMMAD versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI

R4 (1) (b) (iii) After removing the appellant who has served as a messenger in the Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), section 4, to serve them with call notice and He was removed from the job following an inquiry into the allegations. Issuance of Showcase Notice, Appointment of Inquiry Officer and Issue of Final Showcase Notice, As per Rules of University Effectiveness and Discipline, Delayed absence, absence without leave and non-compliance of Chairperson's order. Had duties. In the present case, the Deputy Registrar of the University appointed the Inquiry Officer to initiate the departmental proceedings initiated against the Appellant, in the circumstances ignoring the essential provisions of the University's competence and discipline line rolls by the Inquiry Officer. Inquiries report revealed that only the respondent's written response to the call notice was taken into consideration and no witnesses were examined thereafter. A document was referenced. In the final showcase notice published in the newspaper exhibit along with the call notice, no details of the absence of the appellant were given, nothing was on record to indicate when and with whom and in whose presence the appeal was made. The plaintiff had misbehaved with her teachers and which order of the chairperson was disobeyed, her refusal to dismiss the job passed against the appellant was denied, in the circumstances illegal, invalid and disregarding the rules. , Which cannot be retained. Timely ban power of attorney advocate Tank lawyer